The Lost Sarasvati, from River to Goddess: Michel Danino

தமிழ் பாரம்பரியம்

(Tamil Heritage)

invite you and your friends to a lecture and slide-show on

“The Lost Sarasvati, from River to Goddess”

by Michel Danino

5.30pm on Saturday, 3rd, September, 2011

Vinobha Hall, Thakkar Bapa Vidyalaya, 58 Venkatanarayana Road, T Nagar, Chennai

In the Rig-Veda, the Sarasvati is both a goddess and a river—a “mighty” river “flowing from the mountain to the sea”, and the only one to be deified in the Vedic hymns. In the late Vedic era, it broke up and was reduced to a small seasonal stream—the only major river to suffer this fate in northwest India. At the same time, Sarasvati, the goddess of speech, knowledge and the arts, grew in stature and became in many ways the fountainhead of India’s classical civilization.

But there is another side to the story, which began with the rediscovery of the river’s dry bed in the nineteenth century: later, archaeological explorations initiated by Marc Aurel Stein eventually unearthed hundreds of Harappan sites  in the Sarasvati’s basin. As it turned out, the lost river has provided an unexpected bridge between the Vedic world and the Indus-Sarasvati civilization, calling for a fresh look at old models.

French-born Michel Danino has been living in India since 1977. A long-time student of India’s protohistory, he authored in 1996 The Invasion That Never Was, a first study of the Aryan problem. He has given numerous lectures in cultural and educational institutions all over India about the Indus-Sarasvati civilization, the Aryan problem, India’s scientific and ecological heritage, India’s contributions to world culture, and challenges faced by Indian culture today.

He has in particular contributed original research on the mathematics of Harappan town-planning (with a focus on Dholavira), with significant results in the field of metrology. In 2006, Michel Danino’s study of the Aryan problem gave rise to a French book, due to be published in an English adaptation. His latest works are The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati(Penguin Books India, 2010) and Indian Culture and India’s Future (DK Printworld, 2011).

Event Facebook Page.

Tags: 
avatar
  • http://twitter.com/S_Chaitanya Chaitanya S

    Excellent work by Danino. A lot of painstaking research went into it.

  • Ibn al-Dunya

    What are his qualifications? I have been searching but all I found was that after being bored by four years of higher education in science, he turned to ancient Indian history. Not that a degree guarantees good results, but I just wanted to know how his work has been received in professional journals and such. I am wary of the Rajaram crowd…

  • http://twitter.com/ma_falesu Siddhartha Chatterje

    Ibn,

    To put Danino’s point of views in better context, check out these:

    1) His conclusions – http://micheldanino.voiceofdharma.com/indus.html
    2) The presentation and discussion thread in here http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndiaArchaeology/message/10441
    3) His opinion http://www.mirroroftomorrow.org/blog/_archives/2010/5/6/4502388.html

    As for qualifications, I dont think Max Muller/Sir William Jones had any qualifications yet we all are made to read the very time-line and inaccurate historical narratives they produced since that is very convenient for power that be. Sir JN Sarcar did not have any qualification either but most details about Mughal dynasty or Maratha uprising we know today were the result of his rigorous work. And with all the credentials in the world, Michael Witzel’s stand is so biased that he rejected recent archaeological discoveries as fancies of pro-Hindutva group. He stopped short of rejecting reality because that appeared to be biased against his speculations. Dont get me started on Wendy Donizer.

    Finally, I am as worried about anti-Rajaram crowd as you are about Rajaram-crowd. Except Koenraad Elst’s effort to discuss his points and Jacob de Molay’s acknowledgment of his work, I do not know any so called historian with credential who even tried to discuss his points academically. Almost all discussion about his points (or for that matter Aditi Mukherjee’s Invasion of the Sacred) becomes a series of passionate ad-hominem attacks.

  • Ibn al-Dunya

    I don’t really care what grievances people have with one group or another. I just want a well-researched argument. I ignore Witzel and Doniger as much as I ignore Rajaram. And I am not sure who read Muller anymore except in some antiquated syllabus. Muller is read more for how NOT to do history or to see what Europeans thought of India more than for his own explications.

    Thanks for the links…I will certainly check them out.

  • http://twitter.com/prashanthkpp Prashanth K.P.

    At a time when Indian culture has been floundered and whored by anybody who so deemed it fit to their solitary or at times collective purpose, Danino has stood ground to some spectacular research and theory on the Aryan aspect and several other Hindu ancestory.  Quite commendable.  

  • Yatin Dhareshwar

    There was a time, when the Sarasvati was the supreme river in the Indian subcontinent by far. It was the time when the Arya tribes were finding their feet in Northern India, Pakistan and then later Afghanistan. A time of many great battles, wars and also the composition of the Rig Veda – perhaps the most ancient texts in the world.

    The Sarasvati stood witness to cataclysmic events for centuries until one day it just dried up….

    Blood on the river Sarasvati is my attempt to bring to life events that may have occurred several thousand years ago, when the river was at its mightiest.

    http://rigvedafiction.blogspot.com/2011/08/birth-of-divodasa-part-i.html